Numeric multivariate data is ubiquitous and viewing data within data-space (rather than summarized as parameters or statistics) is a critical part of exploratory data analysis and the data analysis workflow in general. Viewing multivariate quickly becomes complex. Linear projections of high dimensional spaces offer a scalable way to extend viewing these data-spaces as the dimension of the data increases. Traditionally, these are viewed as static orthogonal pairs. Alternatively, tours, are a class of linear projections that animate many frames over small changes in the projection basis.
The package spinifex allows the application of manual tours, where a selected variable is rotated fully into and out of the give projection basis. Its also facilitates a layered composition of tours interoperable with tourr. These composition can then be animated to interactive html widget with plotly or to .gif/.mp4 format with gganimate.
Tours are a class of dynamic orthogonal (linear) projections that embed \(p-\)dimensional space into a \(d-\)dimensional subspace and animates many such projections over small changes to the projection basis (essesentially the orientation of the data). Tours are useful in identify clustering, outliers, and structure held within numeric multivariate data.
This concept is analogous to shadows. Suppose a bar stool is held in front of a light source. This is a linear projection of a 3D object casting a 2D shadow. Some projections may not convey much information (the seat may only cast a circular shadow). If we observe the shadow change over as the barstool is rotated, we quickly understand the shape of the object. The same is true for tours; watching the permanence of observations between frames conveys more information than unlinked orthogonal views.
We focus on the application of the manual tours in this
document. In a manual tour, the contributions of one variable are
manipulated to show the impact that it has on the structure of the
projection. Controlling the coefficients of a single variable can be
insightful after finding a projection of interest, perhaps with the use
of a guided tour. A wider application of tours can be
accomplished with with the package tourr
, CRAN.R-project.org/package=tourr.
In the below examples we go through some use cases for manual tours. To get started we’ll load a couple packages we use.
For this example, we’ll be using the penguins data set. It consists of 333 observations of penguins near Palmer Station, Antarctica across 3 different species.
The following example will explore how changing the contributions of
the variable, bill_length_mm
, will affect the structure of
the projection. We’ll initialize a random basis and then view the
manipulation space.
dat_std <- scale_sd(penguins_na.rm[, 1:4])
colnames(dat_std) <- c("bl", "bd", "fl", "bm")
bas_pca <- basis_pca(dat_std)
clas <- penguins_na.rm$species
ggtour(basis_array = bas_pca, data = dat_std) +
proto_basis()
We started from a random basis, that explains the orthogonal
projection from \(p\) to \(d\) space. Use proto_basis
to
see the reference axes, a visual depiction of how the variables
contributed to the xy directions of the 2D projection.
We want to explore how the coefficients of aede2
contribute to the structure in this projection, so we set the
manipulation variable to its column number, 3. To change the
contributions without breaking the orthogonality of the other variables,
we need to add a dimension. We call this new space the manipulation
space, which can be viewed with the function
view_manip_space()
. Note that the projection plane
containing the reference frame is laid down on the surface, while the
manipulation dimension is at a right angle out-of-plane, with a full
contribution on the manip var.
Now we have the freedom to change the contributions of
bill_length_mm
, we do so by controlling the values of the
in-plane angle, \(\theta\), and the out
of plane angle, \(\phi\). in this
example we’ll perform a radial manual tour, holding \(\theta\) constant while we vary the values
of \(\phi\) to remove and maximize the
contribution of the manipulation variable.
## Save a tour path
mt_path <- manual_tour(basis = bas_pca, manip_var = 3)
## Compose the display
my_ggtour <- ggtour(basis_array = mt_path, data = dat_std, angle = .2) +
## Angle is the distance between (geodesically) interpolated frames
proto_default(aes_args = list(color = clas, shape = clas))
## Animate
animate_gganimate(ggtour = my_ggtour, fps = 6,
height = 3, width = 4.5, units = "in", res = 150)
## Or as a plotly html widget
#animate_plotly(ggt, fps = 6)
Another of the manual tour is the creation a
glyph-maps, where time series can be shown side-by-side, like
faceting (offsetting) on their lat/long physical positions. We’ll use
the following GGally
glyph-map as an example
We’ll perform a horizontal rotation and followed by the vertical
rotation before bringing them together. we apply the horizontal rotation
(\(\theta\)= 0
) on the
day
values (manip_var = 3
). Pre-multiply the
data with the rotation matrix to project the data.
## Initialize
nasa_std <- cbind(
GGally::nasa[c("x", "y")],
scale_sd(GGally::nasa[c("day", "surftemp")])
)
bas <- tourr::basis_init(ncol(nasa_std), 2)
## Horizontal rotation
m_sp_x <- create_manip_space(basis = bas, manip_var = 3)
rot_mat_x <- rotate_manip_space(manip_space = m_sp_x,
theta = 0, phi = pi / 6)
rot_x <- data.frame(as.matrix(nasa_std) %*% as.matrix(rot_mat_x))
colnames(rot_x) <- c("x1", "x2", "x_manip_sp")
Likewise, we’ll perform a vertical rotation (\(\theta\)= pi/2
) on surface
temperature (manip_var = 4). Combine the rotations and plot just the
rotated values without lat/long or x/y markers, neat!
## Vertical rotation
m_sp_y <- create_manip_space(basis = bas, manip_var = 4)
rot_mat_y <- rotate_manip_space(manip_space = m_sp_y,
theta = pi / 2, phi = pi / 6)
rot_y <- data.frame(as.matrix(nasa_std) %*% as.matrix(rot_mat_y))
colnames(rot_y) <- c("y1", "y2", "y_manip_sp")
## Combine rotations
rot_xy <- bind_cols(rot_x, rot_y, .name_repair = "unique") %>%
select(x = x1, y = y2)
ggplot(rot_xy, aes(x = x, y = y)) + geom_point(size = 0.3) +
theme_bw() + labs(x = "", y = "")
Radial tours are often employed after an interesting feature has been
identified. How the contributions of each variable impact the structure
of resulting PCA, for example, might be interesting to explore.
Alternatively, we can perform projection pursuit to maximize an
objective function within the projection and performing a hill-climbing
algorithm and explore what effect the contributions of the variables
have there. Let’s do just that, optimizing a Holes indexed guided tour
using the package tourr
.
## Transform data
dat_std <- scale_sd(penguins_na.rm[, 1:4])
## Save holes indexed guided tour
holes_path <- save_history(dat_std, tourr::guided_tour(tourr::holes()))
## Compose display
ggt <- ggtour(holes_path, dat_std, angle = .2) +
proto_default(aes_args = list(color = clas, shape = clas))
## Animate
animate_gganimate(ggt, height = 3, width = 4.5, units = "in", res = 150)
## Or as a plotly html widget
#animate_plotly(ggt)
This shows the optimization path of the holes index. We’ll grab the reference axes from the last frame and used that a starting orientation for a manual tour.
## Save only the final holes frame
holes_bas <- basis_guided(dat_std, index_f = tourr::holes(), d = 2)
## Print a single frame composition, a ggplot
ggtour(holes_bas, dat_std, angle = .2) +
proto_default(aes_args = list(color = clas, shape = clas))
We’ll select aede2
as the manip_var, as it is mostly
orthogonal to four of the other variables and often has a larger
contribution than tars1
.
## Alternatively, ask for the variable by rank of the magnitude contributed:
(mv <- manip_var_of(holes_bas, rank = 1))
## A radial, manual tour from the resulting holes basis
mt_path <- manual_tour(holes_bas, mv)
## Compose tour
ggt <- ggtour(mt_path, dat_std) +
proto_point(aes_args = list(color = clas, shape = clas)) +
proto_basis() +
proto_origin()
## Animate
animate_gganimate(ggt, height = 3, width = 4.5, units = "in", res = 150)
## Or as a plotly html widget
#animate_plotly(ggt)
We can see that aede2
is important in distinguishing
between the purple cluster and the green cluster. However, even when its
contribution is zeros the contribution of tars1
is enough
to keep the cluster from overlapping.
The name ‘spinifex’ comes from the spinifex hopping mouse (wiki), a nocturnal dessert mouse common to arid zones in central and western Australia. As to its relation to this work, in the words of Di Cook “It spins, it hops and needs a mouse.”