The patterncausality package implements a novel approach for detecting and analyzing causal relationships in complex systems. Key features include:
This algorithm has a lot of advantages.
You can install the development version of patterncausality from GitHub with:
# install.packages("devtools")
::install_github("skstavroglou/pattern_causality") devtools
You can also install the package from CRAN with:
install.packages("patterncausality")
We can import the existing data.
library(patterncausality)
data(climate_indices)
head(climate_indices)
#> Date AO AAO NAO PNA
#> 1 1979-01-01 -2.2328 0.2088 -1.38 -0.69
#> 2 1979-02-01 -0.6967 0.3563 -0.67 -1.82
#> 3 1979-03-01 -0.8141 0.8992 0.78 0.38
#> 4 1979-04-01 -1.1568 0.6776 -1.71 0.09
#> 5 1979-05-01 -0.2501 0.7237 -1.03 1.35
#> 6 1979-06-01 0.9332 1.7000 1.60 -1.64
This dataset contains 4 famous time series of climate index, we can
find the introduction of this dataset in the CRAN and R documment, we
could use the patterncausality
in this dataset to detect
the hidden causality in this climate system.
The climate system is a typical complex system like lorenz system, which are both originating from the climate system, it’s a good example to show how to find the hidden causality in the complex system.
First of all, we need to determine the E
and
tao
, it could be easy to complete by
optimalParametersSearch
function like this:
<- climate_indices[, -1] # remove the date column
dataset <- optimalParametersSearch(Emax = 5, tauMax = 5, metric = "euclidean", dataset = dataset) parameter
E | tau | Total | Positive | Negative | Dark |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 1 | 0.5503802 | 0.5529091 | 0.44647239 | 0.0006185057 |
2 | 2 | 0.5672403 | 0.5722529 | 0.42461112 | 0.0031359329 |
2 | 3 | 0.5647436 | 0.5471488 | 0.45106762 | 0.0017836150 |
2 | 4 | 0.5538362 | 0.5485637 | 0.44961187 | 0.0018243903 |
2 | 5 | 0.5616083 | 0.5433907 | 0.45513014 | 0.0014791531 |
3 | 1 | 0.3203775 | 0.3460809 | 0.24690959 | 0.4070094904 |
3 | 2 | 0.3362460 | 0.4010403 | 0.25410446 | 0.3448552507 |
3 | 3 | 0.3388998 | 0.3657369 | 0.26857083 | 0.3656922393 |
Of course, we can also change the distance style to calculate the distance matrix or even custom distance function, we can find more inforation on our website. Then according the combo that produces the highest percentages collectively, we can choose the best parameters here.
After the parameters are confirmed, we could calculate the pattern causality.
<- climate_indices$AO
X <- climate_indices$AAO
Y <- pcLightweight(X, Y, E = 3, tau = 1, metric = "euclidean", h = 1, weighted = TRUE, verbose = FALSE)
pc print(pc)
#> Pattern Causality Analysis Results:
#> Total: 0.2336
#> Positive: 0.4471
#> Negative: 0.1380
#> Dark: 0.4150
The percentages of each causality status will be displayed below.
To examine the causality status at each time point, we can run the
following code and find the causality strength at each time point by
function pcFullDetails
, the causality_predict
is the predicted causality status at each point, the parameter
weighted = TRUE
is used to for erf function and if it’s
FALSE, then it will just use the 1 or 0 to present the causality
strength, however, whatever which one is used, the total causality
points will be the same.
<- climate_indices$AO
X <- climate_indices$AAO
Y <- pcFullDetails(X, Y, E = 3, tau = 1, metric = "euclidean", h = 1, weighted = TRUE, verbose = FALSE)
detail <- detail$causality_predict
predict_status <- detail$causality_real real_status
Then the causality strength series will be saved in
predict_status
and real_status
, if we want to
plot the causality strength series, we can use the
plot_causality
function for the
pc_full_details
class, and it will show the continuous
causality strength series in the whole time period, we can find the
dynamic pattern causality strength by this way.
After calculating the causality, we can get the result here.
Pairs | total | positive | negative | dark | Dataset |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL –> MSFT | 0.2698665 | 0.3881279 | 0.1369863 | 0.4748858 | stock |
MSFT –> AAPL | 0.2759887 | 0.4075893 | 0.1388393 | 0.4535714 | stock |
AO –> AAO | 0.2841121 | 0.326087 | 0.2318841 | 0.442029 | climate |
AAO –> AO | 0.2803738 | 0.3602941 | 0.2647059 | 0.375 | climate |
AO –> P | 0.3084112 | 0.1192053 | 0.4503311 | 0.4304636 | AUCO |
P –> AO | 0.3308411 | 0.3374233 | 0.2515337 | 0.4110429 | AUCO |
Stavros is lecturer in credit risk and fin-tech at the University of Edinburgh Business School and is the main creator for the algorithm of the pattern causality.
Athanasios is professor in econometrics and business statistics of Monash Business School and is the main author of the pattern causality.
Hui is MPhil student in econometrics and business
statistics of Monash Business School and is the author and maintainer of
the patterncausality
package.
Stavroglou, S. K., Pantelous, A. A., Stanley, H. E., & Zuev, K. M. (2019). Hidden interactions in financial markets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(22), 10646-10651.
Stavroglou, S. K., Pantelous, A. A., Stanley, H. E., & Zuev, K. M. (2020). Unveiling causal interactions in complex systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(14), 7599-7605.
Stavroglou, S. K., Ayyub, B. M., Kallinterakis, V., Pantelous, A. A., & Stanley, H. E. (2021). A novel causal risk‐based decision‐making methodology: The case of coronavirus. Risk Analysis, 41(5), 814-830.
0 errors | 0 warnings | 0 notes
There are currently no downstream dependencies for this package